Online Film Critics Society: ‘Hurt Locker’ named Best Picture of 2009 by Online Film Critics Society

The Online Film Critics Society, of which I am a member, has announced its award winners for 2009:

Best Picture: The Hurt Locker

Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker

Best Actor: Jeremy Renner, The Hurt Locker

Best Actress: Melanie Laurent, Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress: Mo’Nique, Precious

Best Original Screenplay: Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds

Best Adapted Screenplay: Wes Anderson and Noah Baumbach, Fantastic Mr. Fox, based on a book by Roald Dahl

Best Documentary: Anvil!: The Story of Anvil

Best Picture Not in the English Language: The White Ribbon

Best Animated Feature: Up

Best Cinematography: Robert Richardson, Inglourious Basterds

Best Score: Michael Giacchino, Up

Best Editing: Chris Innis and Bob Murawski, The Hurt Locker

via Online Film Critics Society: ‘Hurt Locker’ named Best Picture of 2009 by Online Film Critics Society.

What do all of these award winners have in common?  None of them were my pick for the awards in question.  But then again, I didn’t see most of the 2009 nominees — or any of the award-winning pictures, for that matter.  My vote was because it was mandatory, not because I felt I had a handle on the best of 2009.

(So why am I even in the OFCS, you ask?  Hey, I’m just here for the donuts.)

4 Responses to “Online Film Critics Society: ‘Hurt Locker’ named Best Picture of 2009 by Online Film Critics Society”

  1. Th. says:

    .

    So what did you vote for?

  2. Well, since the only things I saw this year that really impressed me at all were The Men Who Stare at Goats and District 9, they both figured heavily in my voting. (Somehow, The Fantastic Mr. Fox left me cold.)

  3. Psy says:

    I’d be very interested to know what the OFCS would consider the Worst [Insert Category Here] of 2009…or any year for that matter. These Best Of lists rarely surprise and always seeming a little too overburdened with “safe” picks. A Worst Of list might do more to reveal the character of a particular organization, and its members. Or maybe I’m just being cantankerous.

  4. Unfortunately, worst-of lists can be just as predictable. Have the Razzies surprised any time in the past decade?